I had a fine collection of wire baskets from an old swimming pool locker that I used to stage the robot sculptures. They seemed to work fairly well - at least I was able to raise them off the table and isolate each one individually.
The Bots are made of raku fired clay and then embellished with a variety of metal hardware, jewelry pieces, watch parts, springs, and screws. They are then mounted on pedestals and coated with some really cool, iridescent layers of paint.
Susan Lee's Madonna of Too Much Information was featured front and center - she garnered a lot of attention.
Once people realized that 1220 is the melting point of aluminum, they seemed to "get it".
What I learned in displaying this historically pivotal novel, however, is that people still think the book is about censorship and book burning. While books do get burned (in the print and the film version), Bradbury himself is on record more than once telling us that it is a story about the digital pablum that television spews at the viewers and about how our brains are turning into mush because of it.
I am beginning to think that conceptual art is not a good direction for me. Quite frankly I am not sure I enjoy explaining my artistic premise over and over and over again. Should I be satisfied with a body of work if I am the only one who feels that it is expressing what I want the viewer to see? Or what I want them to think? If the visual art I create requires me to print a full page of typed information to explain the concept,
the history of the creation, and the end result, have I succeeded at all?